Thursday, March 8, 2012

Patagonia: Our Common Waters Campaign


No natural resource is more precious. None is shrinking faster as people consume more and more.

Our Common Waters, Patagonia’s current campaign, is about balancing human water use with the needs of animals and plants. The more water people use, the less there is for everything else. The more water we waste, the more habitat we destroy. The more we pollute our streams and lakes, the harder it is for animals and plants to survive.

In this campaign, we connect water use, the consumer society and threats to biodiversity. The phrase “water rights” carries a larger meaning in this campaign than our usual use of it: Who and what has the right to water?

Existing threats range from increased human water use and water stress to pollution to dams. Each of these is made worse by climate change, which is already altering temperature and river flows. Almost half the animals on the U.S. threatened and endangered list call freshwater home.

An essential part of this campaign is Patagonia’s story as a company: the water cost of doing business, reducing our water footprint and reporting on our water use.

At Patagonia we’re only beginning to learn just how much water we consume – or how much water is used in our name.

As individuals we have to remember that much of the water used in our name doesn’t come out of the tap but rather as our share of the sum of industrial production and consumption. So it’s important for us all to keep an eye on what business does to increase – or meet – the challenges posed by water scarcity and pollution.

Source: http://www.patagonia.com/us/patagonia.go?assetid=58844

Conservation Groups Support Swinomish Tribe Battle to Protect Skagit River and Salmon

From Earthjustice:

Skagit River. The river and some its tributaries consistently fail to meet the basic
flow requirements to maintain a healthy river system for fish and people. (USGS)

March 7, 2012

Seattle, WA — Today, Earthjustice and the Center for Environmental Law and Policy (CELP) filed a friend of the court brief with the Washington State Court of Appeals in support of the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community and its ongoing effort to protect the Skagit River and salmon.
 
In their brief, Earthjustice and CELP argue that the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) cannot allow more water to be withdrawn from the troubled Skagit River and its tributaries for new junior water uses because such new uses would further impair stream-flows. Impaired stream-flows damage salmon, other wildlife and communities that depend on the water.
 
The tribal community’s appeal, filed in 2008, challenges Ecology’s 2006 revision to the in-stream flow rule for the Skagit River and its tributaries.

The Skagit River and some its tributaries consistently fail to meet the basic flow requirements to maintain a healthy river system for fish and people. There are numerous reasons for this including excessive water diversion to development, municipalities and agriculture.

In spite of low flow and poor water quality in some Skagit tributaries, Ecology chose to revise the Skagit flow rule so that it could still give away large additional quantities of water for future uses—domestic, municipal, commercial, industrial, agricultural and livestock watering—at the expense of what’s needed for a healthy in-stream flows. Ecology claimed to do so under the rarely invoked “overriding consideration of public interest” (OCPI) exemption, a gross misreading of Washington’s water laws. The resulting leapfrog of the new junior water rights holders ahead of more senior in-stream water right goes against the basics of Washington’s long-time water laws that have always subscribed to the “first in time, first in right” doctrine.

“Along with the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, we will not stand by to see critical tributaries of the Skagit reduced to trickles simply because Ecology is unwilling to uphold the law and protect the instream flow reservations that preserve the river and its wildlife,” said Suzanne Skinner of CELP. “The Skagit must be conserved for future generations and we will work to protect the precious water that salmon and people need to survive.”

The conservationists’ brief challenges Ecology’s claim that the “public interest” exemption creates a loophole to ignore protecting basic in-stream flows whenever Ecology finds it convenient or generally desirable to do so. Rather, the public interest doctrine is meant to be used in limited emergencies such as fire suppression or health emergencies. That limited, temporary, emergency use was Ecology’s long-standing position until very recently when it started to stretch the emergency exception into a big, permanent loophole.

“Excessive demand is depriving too many rivers of water, and fish and wildlife are suffering,” said Janette Brimmer, an Earthjustice attorney. “It is Ecology’s job to protect the water resources of the state, but Ecology has chosen to avoid the hard work of protecting water and instead uses the co-called public interest exemption with increasing frequency to hand out water beyond what is actually available. Limiting this exemption to the emergency uses contemplated by the legislature will help protect rivers and streams throughout the state from Ecology’s increasing failure to adequately regulate water use in the state.”

In 2008, the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community challenged Ecology’s revision of the in-stream flow rule for the Skagit. The Superior Court ruled against the tribal community and its members appealed to the Washington State Court of Appeals.

Contact:
Janette Brimmer, Earthjustice, (206) 343-7340, ext. 1029
Suzanne Skinner, Center for Environmental Law and Policy, (206) 605-0461
 

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Know Your Rights - Waterkeeper Alliance


You may not be aware that you have the right to clean water. You may also not be aware that your participation is needed to protect the water sources in your area. The Waterkeeper Alliance provides information about your right to clean water, and will help you find a way to work in your community to protect these rights. Join the movement for "fishable, swimmable and drinkable waterways worldwide."

From Waterkeeper Alliance:

You have the right to clean water.

You are the owner of your stream, river, lake, bay and coastal waterway.
You have the right to use those waters as long as you don’t interfere with their use by anyone else — and as long as they are free from pollution and destruction by our hands, there is plenty for all.
Pollution is theft. Government is entrusted to protect our waterways for the use and enjoyment of the public. When government fails, it is the right and responsibility of citizens to enforce environmental laws and protect our right to clean water.

The origins of your right to clean water.

Medieval Code
In the sixth century the Roman Emperor Justinian ordered the codification of imperial legal doctrine as the Corpus Iurus Civilis [Body of Civil Law]. The Justinian Code spread throughout the Roman Empire and forms the basis for English and U.S. Common Law. The Justinian Code spells out the Public Trust Doctrine: The public — no individual, no government, no corporation and no polluter — owns our waterways.

United Nations
The right to clean water is almost universally recognized worldwide. The United Nations Charter and the legally binding 1966 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights implicitly and explicitly recognize the human right to clean water.

Fishable & Swimmable
U.S. Congress passed the Clean Water Act in 1972. The goals of the law are broad and ambitious: fishable and swimmable waterways and zero discharge of pollution into our rivers, lakes and coastal waters by 1985. We’ve missed the deadline. But the national goal and the law remain in effect.

Citizen Action
U.S. federal law and the laws of nations around the world give citizens the power to prosecute environmental crimes. Waterkeeper Organizations enforce these laws, patrolling our waterways and protecting our communities.

Source: http://www.waterkeeper.org/


You can become a Waterkeeper by visiting this webpage: http://www.waterkeeper.org/ht/d/sp/i/212/pid/212

Friday, March 2, 2012

Rachel Carson Sense of Wonder Contest


Star Light
Sense of "Water" Contest

2012 is the 40th Anniversary of the Clean Water Act, and this year's Sense of Wonder contest will focus on water. To honor this anniversary, the contest has been renamed the Sense of Water Contest for 2012. The deadline for entries is June 1, 2012.

The U.S. EPA, Generations United, the Dance Exchange, Rachel Carson Council, Inc., and the National Center for Creative Aging announce a poetry, essay, photo and dance contest. Entries must be from a team of two or more persons—a young person and an older person.
We would like your team to share your love for water through a creative project that captures water around us. Capture what you hear, see, feel and taste as you explore and study water. Contestants will work across generations to share through one of these distinct mediums their own interactions with and reflections about the sense of water.

Dance video entries are not limited to the moving body. You can use live performers and/ or capture movement and change visible in nature: birds landing, trees shaking in a storm, a river flowing...
Experienced and first time dancers and video makers are encouraged to participate.

Let Rachel Carson's words inspire you. In 1951 Rachel Carson published her second book, The Sea Around Us. The New York Times Book Review wrote:
"Each of Miss Carson's chapters is worth sampling and savoring, and her book adds up to enjoyment that should not be passed by. Every person who reads it will look on the sea with new pleasure."
Visit the website:

http://www.epa.gov/aging/resources/thesenseofwonder/index.htm

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Coming to a city near you?


Japan Nuclear Disaster: Fukushima Power Plant Remains Fragile, Plant Chief Says   
2/28/12     
By MARI YAMAGUCHI
OKUMA, Japan -- Japan's tsunami-hit Fukushima power plant remains fragile nearly a year after it suffered multiple meltdowns, its chief said Tuesday, with makeshift equipment – some mended with tape – keeping crucial systems running.
An independent report, meanwhile, revealed that the government downplayed the full danger in the days after the March 11 disaster and secretly considered evacuating Tokyo.
Journalists given a tour of the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant on Tuesday, including a reporter from The Associated Press, saw crumpled trucks and equipment still lying on the ground. A power pylon that collapsed in the tsunami, cutting electricity to the plant's vital cooling system and setting off the crisis, remained a mangled mess.
Officials said the worst is over but the plant remains vulnerable.
"I have to admit that it's still rather fragile," said plant chief Takeshi Takahashi, who took the job in December after his predecessor resigned due to health reasons. "Even though the plant has achieved what we call 'cold shutdown conditions,' it still causes problems that must be improved."
The government announced in December that three melted reactors at the plant had basically stabilized and that radiation releases had dropped. It still will take decades to fully decommission the plant, and it must be kept stable until then.
The operators have installed multiple backup power supplies, a cooling system, and equipment to process massive amounts of contaminated water that leaked from the damaged reactors.
But the equipment that serves as the lifeline of the cooling system is shockingly feeble-looking. Plastic hoses cracked by freezing temperatures have been mended with tape. A set of three pumps sits on the back of a pickup truck.
Along with the pumps, the plant now has 1,000 tanks to store more than 160,000 tons of contaminated water.
Radiation levels in the Unit 1 reactor have fallen, allowing workers to repair some damage to the reactor building. But the Unit 3 reactor, whose roof was blown off by a hydrogen explosion, resembles an ashtray filled with a heap of cigarette butts.
A dosimeter recorded the highest radiation reading outside Unit 3 during Tuesday's tour – 1.5 millisievert per hour. That is a major improvement from last year, when up to 10 sieverts per hour were registered near Units 1 and 2.
Exposure to more than 1,000 millisievert, or 1 sievert, can cause radiation sickness including nausea and an elevated risk of cancer.
Officials say radiation hot spots remain inside the plant and minimizing exposure to them is a challenge. Employees usually work for about 2-3 hours at a time, but in some areas, including highly contaminated Unit 3, they can stay only a few minutes.
Since the March 11 crisis, no one has died from radiation exposure.
Tuesday's tour, organized by plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co., or TEPCO, came as an independent group released a report saying the government withheld information about the full danger of the disaster from its own people and from the United States.
The report by the private Rebuild Japan Initiative Foundation delivers a scathing view of how leaders played down the risks of the reactor meltdowns while holding secret discussions of a worst-case scenario in which massive radiation releases would require the evacuation of a much wider region, including Tokyo. The discussions were reported last month by the AP.
The report, compiled from interviews with more than 300 people, paints a picture of confusion during the days immediately after the accident. It says U.S.-Japan relations were put at risk because of U.S. frustration and skepticism over the scattered information provided by Japan.
The misunderstandings were gradually cleared up after a bilateral committee was set up on March 22 and began regular meetings, according to the report.
It credits then-Prime Minister Naoto Kan for ordering TEPCO not to withdraw its staff from the plant and to keep fighting to bring it under control.
TEPCO's president at the time, Masataka Shimizu, called Kan on March 15 and said he wanted to abandon the plant and have all 600 TEPCO staff flee, the report said. That would have allowed the situation to spiral out of control, resulting in a much larger release of radiation.
A group of about 50 workers was eventually able to bring the plant under control.
TEPCO, which declined to take part in the investigation, has denied it planned to abandon Fukushima Dai-ichi. The report notes the denial, but says Kan and other officials had the clear understanding that TEPCO had asked to leave.
But the report criticizes Kan for attempting to micromanage the disaster and for not releasing critical information on radiation leaks, thereby creating widespread distrust of the government.
Kan's office did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the report.
Kan acknowledged in a recent interview with AP that the release of information was sometimes slow and at times wrong. He blamed a lack of reliable data at the time and denied the government hid such information from the public.
The report also concludes that government oversight of nuclear plant safety had been inadequate, ignoring the risk of tsunami and the need for plant design renovations, and instead clinging to a "myth of safety."
"The idea of upgrading a plant was taboo," said Koichi Kitazawa, a scholar who heads the commission that prepared the report. "We were just lucky that Japan was able to avoid the worst-case scenario. But there is no guarantee this kind of luck will prevail next time."

Source: Huffington Post

Photo: Earth Times


Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Where's YOUR Water?

Every day I search the Internet for articles on water, water shortage, water conservation, and so on. Today I clicked on search results for “Where’s My Water?” I expected to find articles related to the world’s water crisis, instead, the links were for a Disney game.

The world’s water crisis is very serious, but if it takes a game to get people to think about water, so be it.



Where's My Water?

Where's My Water? is a fun, simple - yet challenging - physics-based puzzle game featuring Swampy the Alligator and his quest to take a shower. In the app, players guide water through subterranean layers of earth into Swampy's tub. With more than 140 levels and features such as lifelike water physics, richly detailed graphics, achievements, and humorous special effects, the game is one of the top-rated and top-selling apps available today. Since its launch, "Where's My Water?" has been No. 1 in 30 different countries.
http://disney.go.com/wheresmywater/